Blog Archives
Browse Stories By
11/30/06
Filed by
Christian Sandvig
Christian Sandvig: Is A&R the new R&D?
Young programmers may be the new rock stars, if digital media allow anyone to make their own software and content. Is it true that the next big thing on the Internet can be “scouted” and “harvested,” rather than “developed”?11/29/06
Filed by
Steve Anderson
Steve Anderson: Future of Digital Education Panel
How is higher education evolving to accommodate digital technologies in the classroom, changing sensibilities among students and new forms of knowledge, learning and expression? A panel discussion in Second Life takes on these questions in order to think about the future of digital education.11/28/06
Filed by
Justine Cassell
Justine Cassell: Disempowering Girls as Users of Technology
Girls’ use of technology threatens the established social order. That’s the real reason behind the fear of girls using social networking sites.11/28/06
Filed by
Ellen Seiter
Ellen Seiter: Why Santa Brings Playstation, instead of a PC
There is a gaping home technology divide in this country. And Santa knows that one Christmas present can’t fix it, no matter how generous.11/28/06
Filed by
Tara McPherson
This week’s theme: innovative uses and unexpected outcomes
Once upon a time not so long ago, one of the largest, most active groups of innovators in technological communications weren’t scientists or corporations but everyday citizens and amateur system operators.11/27/06
Filed by
Tara McPherson
Tara McPherson: How Literate Are You?
Traditional notions of literacy focus on reading and writing, but, in a digital era, full literacy means competency in a range of media. While media literacy isnĚt a new concept, the term has traditionally focused on interpreting mainstream media messages. ThatĚs a good first step, but we need to push toward a multimedia literacy that includes creating media. We also need to develop curriculum to support such a definition.11/24/06
Filed by
Kate Wittenberg
Kate Wittenberg: Shifting from Publisher Authority to Participation
The vast amount of information now available can be either a benefit or an obstacle to effective learning. Already, online social networks use a different system for credibility than the academic world.11/23/06
Filed by
Kristina Hooper Woolsey
Woolsey: Credibility Does Persist Online, but Needs New Tools
Most suggest that credibility dissolves in the digital domain. I think the opposite is true. Traditional lineages persist, and we can respond to concerns by limiting access or further developing the net.11/22/06
Filed by
Deanna Kuhn
Deanna Kuhn: What develops?
Both children and adolescents exhibit weakness in evaluating evidence and in the metacongnitive ability to assess their own knowledge.11/22/06
Filed by
Ronald E. Rice
Ronald E. Rice: increasing the diversity of “credibility signals”
The indicators of credibility operate at two levels: first that of content, and second of the medium itself. Both are directly affected by the sheer scale of the Internet.11/21/06
Filed by
Kate Wittenberg
Kate Wittenberg: who will create new models for establishing credibility?
Mechanisms for establishing credibility are undergoing rapid change in the digital environment. It is unclear, however, who will guide these new credibility mechanisms. Here, I consider one hypothetical publisher.11/21/06
Filed by
Kristina Hooper Woolsey
Woolsey: Credibility is a Human Issue
Humans continue to be the major source for credibility judgements, even as tools are better and better. Both the young and the old contribute to the problem.11/21/06
Filed by
Andrew Flanagin
This Week’s Theme: Credibility in Digital Media
Spotlighting voices drawn from the MacArthur Series online dialogs on credibility conducted earlier this month.11/20/06
Filed by
Miriam Metzger
Credibility Online is Important and Difficult
The editors of the MacArthur Series volume on Credibility break down the issue for contemporary youth.11/17/06
Filed by
Antonio Lopez




