Spotlight MacArthur Foundation

Shelley Goldman: intentional environments—good for youth?

Filed at 9:14 am on December 12, 2006 in IdentityLeave a comment

Youth who want to change the world can use some help. It’s not all self-discovery and anarchy out there and some pedagogies really are helping youth make a difference.

Do digital technologies enable youth to change the world and become active, engaged and leaders in their larger communities? My answer is yes, but they probably can’t do it alone with out the help of mentors and critical pedagogies.

During the last national election, Kelly, a college student wanted to get out the vote. She created a vote group on Facebook and sent invitations to forty friends.  Within an hour the group had grown to 100, and within days it was so large she stopped checking. It was easy, fast and effective, collecting committed young voters with the touch of a keystroke.

Taken at face value, the story is encouraging about how easy technologies have made it to network and be involved in social movements.

Looking deeper, we find the story of a young person who has dedicated years to political participation. She has gone to leadership academies, run a political club and been a founder and editor of a bi-partisan political print and on line journal. She has registered people to vote on the sidewalks, worked on campaigns, canvassing door-to-door, written policy briefs for office holders, and volunteered at a national convention. She had been a member of on line political groups and received political action emails for years.

Clicking a voter group into existence on Facebook was a small, digitally supported act in an already active political life that also has podcasts and blogging on its horizon. When asked about technology Kelly says she is empowered—somewhat—but that she still needs a lot of help from people in the know if she is going to move beyond business as usual to change the world. She has to reach people far beyond who she can reach through her digital networks.

Technology makes a lot of participation possible, but young people still rely on experienced peers and adults who have intentions to help them in the learning process. Kelly’s political identity is the product of many critical literacy experiences, and many of them were learned in participation with adult political mentors and educators.

Next: Angela Booker: Participation = Power? > >


< < Previous: Sandra Weber thinks that 'public' is young people's new 'private.'

Save or share this post

Bookmark and Share

Tags

Tags: intergenerational, youth-participation

Comments (0)

No comments yet.

Robust discussion/debate is encouraged. Comments are reviewed before posting to ensure they are on topic and do not promote commercial products or services.

Add a Comment

Name
Email (required but private)
Location
URL
Comment
Please enter the word you see in the image below:
Remember my personal information
Notify me of follow-up comments?

Search Spotlight

Blog Archives | Behind the Research Archives

About Spotlight

Spotlight magazine showcases the projects and people funded by the MacArthur Foundation’s Digital Media and Learning Initiative and covers the intersections of technology and learning.  We go beyond the research to show how digital media is being used in classrooms and programs around the world.

Spotlight welcomes guest posts and reader suggestions and comments. Learn more and meet the Spotlight team.

View Spotlight videos and interviews on Vimeo.

Subscribe to Newsletter

Enter your e-mail address to receive our periodic e-newsletter of Spotlight highlights.

Subscribe to Feed

Enter your e-mail address to receive daily updates.

Follow Spotlight

Follow Spotlight on Twitter