« Jessie Daniels: The Epistemology of White Supremacy | Credibility Online is Important and Difficult »
Friday 17th November 2006 12:22 pm
Antonio Lopez: Media Worlds in Collision
When examining digital media education and Native America, we need to challenge conventional thinking about schools, technology and pedagogy. The issue is not reducible to the digital divide, but rather should incorporate wisdom, community and cultural context.
The Nunga (southern Australian aborigines) have a term for the mental software of the European colonizers: “Invader Dreaming.” I take this to be a compact description of a mentality, one that is of the “invaders,” but one that also “invades.”
And just as I view advertising as the dream life of corporations, I think it’s fair to say that digital media is a kind of dream world that requires critical inspection. Consequently, I’m interested in what sociologists refer to as “subjectivities,” ways of perceiving and being in the world and how they impact communities. As an educator and writer engaging different media forms in Native American classrooms, I want to extend this discussion to a broader understanding of communication systems as mental and spiritual environments, or as ”media ecologies.” As Neil Postman remarks, “When media make war against each other, it is a case of worldviews in collision.”
Accordingly, in terms of discussing digital media and Native America, one of the primary battlegrounds of “worldviews in collision” is in schools. As advocates of digital media education, it’s important to be cognizant of alternate modes of engagement, and to design programming that is appropriate and sensitive to these differences, not out of a tokenistic desire for multiculturalism, but out of a real engagement of difference that is positive and constructive.
What has been more obvious to Native Americans is the manner in which education is conventionally used as a tool for control and assimilation into the dominant society. From what I’ve learned in the public school system, I take it as a given that compulsory government education standards encourage students to reinforce the economic and political structure of our society.
While recognizing that there are plenty of excellent and well-meaning educators that do work in the system, it’s important to acknowledge how Native education policy has played out; the implications for the broader society are equally significant. It’s necessary to probe deeply into our own operating system to see the extent to which our education models might be running buggy software.
Category: Race-Ethnicity
Like this post?
- Email this page using tell-a-friend, or
- Save it with one of these social bookmarking tools:
, or - View author profile for Antonio_Lopez.
Kristine Sorensen
In Progress
http://www.in-progress.org
Posted on March 24 2007 9:43 PM
I find this article very interesting but find myself wanting to know more. What school systems does the author work(ed) with? What type of media is taught. In my experience, I am finding that the Indigenous communities I work with have great difficulty utilizing and accessing technology. Because it is so precious it is also treated as a privilege to work with. It is treated with an appreciation that allows for heightened creativity and a sense of sacredness.
My mentors in this field have come from Indigenous artist communities, which have long been dealing with issues of access, economy, and regeneration. I recommend looking to some of these Indigenous media artists that have long been tackling the digital world within the context of their artwork. Hulleah Tsinhnahjinnie and Will Wilson are two established artists that immediately come to mind. There are also several emerging Indigenous artists that are creating artwork that speaks to their cultural and ecological views of the digital media world.
Please keep writing about these issues. It is so important!