« Josh Fouts on Virtual Worlds: Interdependently Yours (Melting Pot or Diasporic Divide?) | Nichole Pinkard: Preparing Urban Youth to be Multiliterate »

Thursday 18th October 2007 11:50 am

Competition Closes with Over 1000 Entries

The application deadline for the Digital Media and Learning Competition closed this week with an unprecedented response. In this post Cathy Davidson and David Theo Goldberg report in on the swell of interest in 2.0 learning. The Competition will award $2 million in funding to emerging leaders, communicators, and innovators shaping the field of digital media and learning.

It’s not often that a big idea takes root. Even less so that a similar idea would find itself germinating at a major foundation willing to take some risks in its behalf.  And less so by half again when idea, producers, and funders are able so easily to triangulate around an experiment.

People think you are all a little nuts. Digital learning? What on earth can you be meaning? A lot of head-banging. Digital learning? You wade in together. Run a competition. People say, oh, that’s really obscure, maybe you’ll get a hundred applications. Maybe you’re ahead of your time. Or too late.

1010 applications too late.  Or too early.

We came away from a Mellon meeting in 2002 seeing a sea-change in the way young people (and the not so young) think, interact, engage, customize media, supply content and share it, interrogate one another energetically (using new media), trade ideas, and just plain get excited about complex combinations of images, text, sound that don’t fit within the silos and disciplinary terms of schools and universities. Those were the folks we wanted to be interacting with. Mobilizing. Almost immediately, we found people like Anne Balsamo, Tim Lenoir, Jeff Schnapp, Kathy Woodward, Tara McPherson, and the incomparable Ruzena Bajcsy. They were experiencing exactly what we were.

But there were others who thought this the silliest idea ever. “You mean IT--Instructional Technology?” they’d say. “No, the complex new ways of thinking that we’re all learning, the global, collaborative ways of learning, less hierarchical, more contributive. Like Wikipedia, like YouTube, like Flickr, like collaborative multiplayer games, all that. How we think, how we learn, how we interact---the foundational concepts of humanistic thinking.” Blank stares.

We launched this competition not knowing if the result would be stunned and shunning silence. Only to realize this week that there are a whole lot of people who have come to this insight too. 1010 applicants at the closing bell. It was pretty amazing, applications streaming 60 to 100 per hour as the day ended. Another 1000 serious enough to register, perhaps to try next year.  30,000 absolutely unique visitors to the competition website over the past two months. 

Yes, you read that right.

This is unprecedented. A sea-swell of interest and engagement around 2.0 learning. Time to take a breather. This is so exciting, to see it happen. 

And now how to find the most compelling projects from so rich a crop. To spell out compelling criteria for judging new modes of learning. Innovation, sustainability, reach, generalizability, interactivity. The right relation between technology as instrument and the generation, circulation of ideas. 

Of form to content. Of teaching to learning, self-creation to self-learning.
To build on a movement building on itself.

Stay tuned.

Special thanks, as always, to the amazing bicoastal team that have been working so hard. They have worked with us and each other incessantly, round the clock and then another round, to run an incredibly efficient, even elegant competition. Servers that held strong through the deluge, code on our FastApps online application system that ticked like a clockwork, human attention to questions and inquiries beyond compare. Erin Ennis, HASTAC grant director at Duke, Suzy Beemer, HASTAC grant director at UCHRI, Jonathan Tarr, HASTAC Project Manager, Brett Walters, HASTAC and Competition webmaster, Khai Tang, Technology Director (and designer of the FastApps system) at UCHRI, Jason Doty, graphic designer, Mark Olson, MacArthur New Media director, A Annette Rubado-Mejia, UCHRI’s HASTAC-Macarthur DML Program Officer, and Jennifer Wilkens assisting Suzy Beemer in the grant management; everyone at Duke’s Arts and Sciences Computing for getting us the best server this side of the national supercomputing centers. A fabulous team, we are your everlasting fans. A thunderous thank you!

Editor’s Note: For an update on the Digital Media and Learning Competition see Cathy & David’s post on the HASTAC blog.  Winners will be announced on February 21st.

Category: Unexpected

Tags: apply, award, competition, entrepreneur, funding, grant, hastac, knowledge-networking, pioneer

Comments