Tuesday 28th November 2006 9:02 am

This week’s theme: innovative uses and unexpected outcomes

Once upon a time not so long ago, one of the largest, most active groups of innovators in technological communications weren’t scientists or corporations but everyday citizens and amateur system operators.

(Editor’s reminder: This week spotlights “Innovative Uses and Unexpected Outcomes”.  Last week Miriam and Andrew spotlighted credibility.)

These network enthusiasts imagined a world of open communications, new forms of fun, and social exchange.  They envisioned an essentially free and democratic system of bottom-up, participatory culture, and they were stoked. 

While this might sound like a tale lifted from the hacker boys of the 1990s or from the creators of YouTube, I’m actually talking about early radio hobbyists almost one hundred years ago.  In his powerful book, Selling the Air, Tom Streeter argues that such hobbyists helped create modern broadcasting, but the one-to-many world of commercial radio and TV that developed in their wake bears little resemblance to the open, plural networks imagined by early ham radio enthusiasts. 

This brief parable reminds us that technologies always enter into powerful, pre-existing social systems, networks of meaning and privilege that can severely circumscribe how technologies develop and whom they best serve.  It also illustrates that youth are often early adopters of new technologies, deploying emerging devices and platforms in ways that often outstrip the expectations of engineers and parents. 

This week’s Spotlight focuses in on various innovations and unexpected outcomes that might emerge from our current digital moment. While such outcomes might typically be seen as ‘positive’ or ‘negative,’ we aim to push beyond simple accounts of digital media and learning as either utopian or dystopian in order to explore today’s practices with an eye attuned to history, policy, and possibility. 

We’re interested in how youth can function as drivers for technological change while also recognizing that technologies are embedded in larger social networks, including the family, peer groups, schools, and commercial culture.  A broad range of topics can be taken up under such a rubric, including issues of access and equity; of media panics and cultural anxieties; of citizenship vs. consumerism; of policy and IP; and of new modes of media literacy and learning.

Category: Unexpected

Tags: , , ,

Like this post?

  • Email this page using tell-a-friend, or
  • Save it with one of these social bookmarking tools: , or
  • View author profile for Tara_McPherson.

Comments

Submit Thoughts

We would love to have you add in the discussion. Please submit your content to our editorial review board:

Name (public):

Email (required but private, only used if our editors need to contact you):

Upload your photo (recommended: this helps bridge online/offline worlds)

Affiliation (public):

URL of your website or institution (public):

Comments:
(We will automatically remove html codes.)

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image:


(Warning: You will NOT be warned if our spam filters delete your comment. Cutting and pasting tends to confuse our spam filters, so always keep a copy. If your comment passes the spam test, you will be shown a brief "Thank You" message after hitting the Submit button, otherwise you will be returned to this page with your comment gone and no warning. Only comments that pass the spam test will be emailed to our editors for approval and posting. Contact our editors using the link in the footer if you have a problem.)

Produced by Games for Change. | TOP